Two-thirds of Australian adults are now overweight (35.6%) or obese (30.8%)
The cost of obesity in Australia is estimated at more than $8.6 billion a year
Reversing the obesity epidemic requires systems-based policy actions
Two-thirds of Australian adults are now overweight (35.6%) or obese (30.8%)1, with levels of obesity having risen steadily in recent decades.2 Modelling predicts that by 2025, healthy weight will decline, overweight will remain steady, and obesity and severe obesity will continue to increase.3 (For more detail, see Trends.)
Excess weight and obesity have a negative effect on many systems in the body and accounted for 8.4% of the total burden of disease in Australia in 2015. This represents the impact of people dying early and living with illness due to conditions caused by excess weight, which was surpassed only by smoking (9.3%) as a modifiable risk factor for ill health.4 (For more detail, see Impacts.)
In addition to the health impacts of overweight and obesity, there are significant economic impacts. The cost of obesity in Australia has been estimated at more than $8.6 billion annually, including $3.8 billion in direct costs (such as healthcare) and $4.8 billion in indirect costs (such as lost productivity).5 These costs will continue to build in line with rising rates of overweight and obesity in Australia.
There are few effective, long-term treatments for individuals to manage obesity.6 To date in Australia, interventions have largely employed individual-level approaches to influence behaviour change to prevent obesity.7 Rising obesity rates are not a failure of collective willpower, however, and an effective strategy to address the issue needs to recognise and address deeper causes. No country has successfully reversed its obesity epidemic because the systemic drivers of obesity continue largely unabated.8
The increased global supply of energy-dense processed foods, together with improved food distribution and marketing, is recognised as a major driver of obesity.9 Food systems are becoming more industrialised, globalised, and dominated by large multi-national companies that produce ultra-processed foods based on inexpensive commodity ingredients.8 These products are often highly palatable, cheap, and contain excessive amounts of energy, fat, sugar or sodium. A high intake of ultra-processed food and drinks is linked to poor diet quality and obesity and may contribute to micronutrient deficiencies by displacing more nutritious whole foods.8
In this environment, systems-based policy actions have the potential to produce long-term changes. Government measures such as regulating marketing of unhealthy food and drinks to children, front-of-pack warning labels, and fiscal policies such as taxes on sugary drinks can help to constrain supply-driven consumption of unhealthy foods.8
Various authorities have proposed evidence-based policies to address the obesity epidemic. These include the World Health Organization’s ‘Best Buys’ and other recommended interventions for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases, which presents policy options to address unhealthy diet and disease areas including cardiovascular disease, diabetes and cancer.10 The World Health Organization also put forward recommendations in its Report of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity.11 In Australia, major reports have included Tipping the Scales12 (a public health consensus on key components of an obesity prevention strategy) and the Australian Food Policy Index13 (scorecard and priority recommendations for Australian governments to tackle obesity).
To assist with priority setting, a comprehensive multi-year study, Assessing Cost-effectiveness of Obesity Prevention Policies in Australia, conducted economic evaluations of 16 interventions and found they were all cost-effective approaches to addressing obesity in the Australian population.9 It was estimated that 11 of the interventions would not only produce cost-effective health benefits, but also save costs in the long-term. Interventions determined to produce cost savings in the long term included:
- increasing the price of alcohol*
- a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages
- kilojoule labelling at fast food outlets, and
- restrictions on price promotions of sugar-sweetened beverages.
The following sections of the Obesity Evidence Hub set out the evidence in three key areas for obesity prevention:
- tax and pricing
- food labelling
Across these areas, there are a range of promising policies that decision-makers could implement to deliver substantial health benefits as part of a comprehensive response to obesity.
* Alcohol makes a significant contribution to energy intake and high alcohol intake is linked to weight gain.